FA+
Shop
Lil Debate about my Balloons
16 years ago
I came up with a new concept regarding balloons as you might have seen here, here and here.
However I've struggled to reach a conclusion on something... what is it?
I can't decide whether getting absorbed into these balloons comes under VORE or BONDAGE when submitting them X3 So far I've been putting it on VORE but I wondered what you guys thought. Here's what I think so far:
VORE:
The idea I feel about these balloons is this - whoever's face is on the balloon has command of it. They tell the balloon who to catch and it is them who ultimately decides when to release the captive, which is also how I view vore: the pred decides how long to keep them captive for. Now the balloon may not have a mouth, but people have always drawn absorption and consider that a form of vore, ans thats how the balloon gets its 'meal'.
BONDAGE:
Vore usually relates to a living pred, and the balloon is NOT alive. Therefore it has no stomach. It is an item which contains a living thing, much like any bondage item such as duct tape, rope, etc. Now the person who's face is on the balloon may control the balloon, but they themself are not PHYSICALLY the balloon, so the captive is not physically inside the person in control.
Given these arguments, and your own thoughts, what are my balloons? Are they another method of vore, or another bondage item?... or something else? Give us your thoughts
However I've struggled to reach a conclusion on something... what is it?
I can't decide whether getting absorbed into these balloons comes under VORE or BONDAGE when submitting them X3 So far I've been putting it on VORE but I wondered what you guys thought. Here's what I think so far:
VORE:
The idea I feel about these balloons is this - whoever's face is on the balloon has command of it. They tell the balloon who to catch and it is them who ultimately decides when to release the captive, which is also how I view vore: the pred decides how long to keep them captive for. Now the balloon may not have a mouth, but people have always drawn absorption and consider that a form of vore, ans thats how the balloon gets its 'meal'.
BONDAGE:
Vore usually relates to a living pred, and the balloon is NOT alive. Therefore it has no stomach. It is an item which contains a living thing, much like any bondage item such as duct tape, rope, etc. Now the person who's face is on the balloon may control the balloon, but they themself are not PHYSICALLY the balloon, so the captive is not physically inside the person in control.
Given these arguments, and your own thoughts, what are my balloons? Are they another method of vore, or another bondage item?... or something else? Give us your thoughts
Seriously though, it's worth remembering that vore does of course refer to eating, and I don't think an artificial object actually can eat things (not even that French mechanical duck).
It's also worth pointing out that the balloon is an entity commanded by someone else, almost like a sort of living zentai. In summary: I vote "bondage".
But when you call them balloonies, do you mean anthro-balloons? (Personally, I find that to be super-hot)
Bondage also has a top that dictates how the bondage is going to happen, so even if it's a balloon that absorbs someone and not a person, it's probably still bondage.
Anyways, maybe it could totally absorb the prey, this way they can possibly blob their way up to being able to capture even possibly macros.
I'm mostly saying this though due to the fact that perhaps it might not be easily seen by the vore crowd who enjoys stuff like this, but isn't a common visitor to the bondage section. Hell, I forget the last time I even glanced in there!
In this case, I really think it's both. The captive is being consumed/engulfed by the balloon.... but it's also a variant of physical restraint.