FA+
Shop
8466
Views
Views
198
Favorites
Favorites
Category
All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 640 x 776
File Size 165.7 kB
Report this content
More from onta
Listed in Folders
Support at http://www.patreon.com/askmarty
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 640 x 776px
File Size 165.7 kB
Listed in Folders
Yeah, but are they still using the best kinda blotters? http://kesey.keseyrage.com/wp-conte.....1/batts064.jpg
Naw, http://th02.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE.....ro-d4qjhdd.jpg
Kidding :p Blank sheets of paper seem to be popular as of recent for stealth and purportedly not diluting the product. http://www.thesubstance-themovie.co.....ay_blotter.jpg have remained popular forever.
Kidding :p Blank sheets of paper seem to be popular as of recent for stealth and purportedly not diluting the product. http://www.thesubstance-themovie.co.....ay_blotter.jpg have remained popular forever.
Sure, for a dealer? Perhaps. Even then, though- if the paper is unperforated, it looks like, well, a blank sheet of blotter paper. You can cut it up as needed.
For the average consumer, it's really convenient- who's going to suspect a few shards of blank paper is something of value?
Art immediately gives away what it is- I'm not sure how it's less conspicuous.
For the average consumer, it's really convenient- who's going to suspect a few shards of blank paper is something of value?
Art immediately gives away what it is- I'm not sure how it's less conspicuous.
Hey, mind explaining why you're being so obnoxious? Not a single person here claimed superiority via their drug use- however, your repeated sarcastic "you're so cool"s imply that you think poorly of individuals purely for referencing substance use.
Given how you list your age as 18 (which on FA is dubious, and can mean anywhere as low as 14) I presume you're still in a high school environment. While it's possible that students there may imbibe in substances simply for the sake of 'being cool,' very few individuals imbibe in substances for the sake of 'being cool.'
There are numerous therapeutic benefits to various substances (the difference between a medicine and a drug is nomenclature), and some are simply fun. People who take substances to 'be cool' are certainly dimwitted, but people who presume all others take drugs to 'be cool' are equally dull.
Please, either formulate a mature argument, or stop spamming people with a pointless post only meant to incite a rise out of commentators.
Given how you list your age as 18 (which on FA is dubious, and can mean anywhere as low as 14) I presume you're still in a high school environment. While it's possible that students there may imbibe in substances simply for the sake of 'being cool,' very few individuals imbibe in substances for the sake of 'being cool.'
There are numerous therapeutic benefits to various substances (the difference between a medicine and a drug is nomenclature), and some are simply fun. People who take substances to 'be cool' are certainly dimwitted, but people who presume all others take drugs to 'be cool' are equally dull.
Please, either formulate a mature argument, or stop spamming people with a pointless post only meant to incite a rise out of commentators.
Nah, we're talking about drugs on a website that isn't deepweb. That's what makes us cool.
Granted, I pretty much look down on anyone who does take drugs for fun. As far as I'm concerned, if you need drugs for fun then you're pretty much a boring individual.
I haven't actually been wrong yet, though.
Granted, I pretty much look down on anyone who does take drugs for fun. As far as I'm concerned, if you need drugs for fun then you're pretty much a boring individual.
I haven't actually been wrong yet, though.
"taking drugs for fun" ≠"needing drugs for fun" though!
I personally don't see any vice in periodically imbibing in something purely for the sensory joy it brings- it's no different from eating ice cream or going to an amusement park, presuming you know the risks and use safe practices.
I personally don't see any vice in periodically imbibing in something purely for the sensory joy it brings- it's no different from eating ice cream or going to an amusement park, presuming you know the risks and use safe practices.
Again, you seem misguided.
Alcohol does the same, and to a much lesser degree so does caffeine. Both are illegal.
Also, with the legalization of marijuana in Colorado, a lot of the money went to funding Education programs for children. Seems like good enough. As well, cannaboids may contain small secrets in furthering cancer research.
Alcohol does the same, and to a much lesser degree so does caffeine. Both are illegal.
Also, with the legalization of marijuana in Colorado, a lot of the money went to funding Education programs for children. Seems like good enough. As well, cannaboids may contain small secrets in furthering cancer research.
But making drugs illegal only opened up the market for them elsewhere.
See, they made it illegal and people started doing it because it was illegal, also a lot of people went to jail for no real reason other than 'continuing habit'. See the problem here?
Now drugs, their side effects, and possible harm are all real issues, as is dependency (which any drug can induce) and addiction (which any drug can also induce, if anyone says that you can't be addicted to marijuana they're kidding themselves.). While you have a right to your opinion on the issue, and you're doing a good job announcing it, you are also wrong on a few accounts. Do not take anything we're saying here as offensive or rude, as I at the very least only mean to inform.
See, they made it illegal and people started doing it because it was illegal, also a lot of people went to jail for no real reason other than 'continuing habit'. See the problem here?
Now drugs, their side effects, and possible harm are all real issues, as is dependency (which any drug can induce) and addiction (which any drug can also induce, if anyone says that you can't be addicted to marijuana they're kidding themselves.). While you have a right to your opinion on the issue, and you're doing a good job announcing it, you are also wrong on a few accounts. Do not take anything we're saying here as offensive or rude, as I at the very least only mean to inform.
"Gay marriage is illegal for unconstitutional and prejudicial reasons, though."
One could make the argument that drugs are, as well.
"Drugs are illegal because they cause more harm than good to the world, and spending money on it does nithing for the economy or scientific/technological/societal advancement."
Mind providing some evidence of these claims? I can provide some evidence to the contrary; if you won't take a comedy article's word, then check their academic and news sources:
http://www.cracked.com/article_1653.....hile-high.html
"The whole point I'm making is that if you are in an altered state of mind due to abusing a substance (which, by the way, even if you're doing it only on occasion is still abuse)"
As you've demonstrated, abuse is a subjective term- by your opinion, drug 'use' does not exist-
"to "better" your sober life then there is probably (most likely) an underlying problem you are overlooking. Why not just go to an amusement park then? Have real positive and memorable experiences rather than indulging in narcotics."
There's two erroneous presumptions here- one is that I'm regularly using narcotics to enhance my sober life (Perhaps you're misconstruing my mentioning of how I thought one use of LSD was enough to change my perspective on the world without a need for more uses, which'd be my bad for not elaborating). The other is that I don't still go to amusement parks and the like. As I mentioned, I'm currently having a great time with friends in an entirely different country; I love to appreciate the sober world, and spend most of my time in it. Variety is the spice of life, and I will occasionally enter an altered state for a few hours.
"Indulging" in narcotics is slightly offensive, as you're once again presuming that simply because I am a drug user I gorge myself on mind-altering substances. This is not the case.
One could make the argument that drugs are, as well.
"Drugs are illegal because they cause more harm than good to the world, and spending money on it does nithing for the economy or scientific/technological/societal advancement."
Mind providing some evidence of these claims? I can provide some evidence to the contrary; if you won't take a comedy article's word, then check their academic and news sources:
http://www.cracked.com/article_1653.....hile-high.html
"The whole point I'm making is that if you are in an altered state of mind due to abusing a substance (which, by the way, even if you're doing it only on occasion is still abuse)"
As you've demonstrated, abuse is a subjective term- by your opinion, drug 'use' does not exist-
"to "better" your sober life then there is probably (most likely) an underlying problem you are overlooking. Why not just go to an amusement park then? Have real positive and memorable experiences rather than indulging in narcotics."
There's two erroneous presumptions here- one is that I'm regularly using narcotics to enhance my sober life (Perhaps you're misconstruing my mentioning of how I thought one use of LSD was enough to change my perspective on the world without a need for more uses, which'd be my bad for not elaborating). The other is that I don't still go to amusement parks and the like. As I mentioned, I'm currently having a great time with friends in an entirely different country; I love to appreciate the sober world, and spend most of my time in it. Variety is the spice of life, and I will occasionally enter an altered state for a few hours.
"Indulging" in narcotics is slightly offensive, as you're once again presuming that simply because I am a drug user I gorge myself on mind-altering substances. This is not the case.
TO ANYONE READING THIS FAR IN:
If you're going to take Ecstasy, KEEP A DRUG TEST KIT NEARBY. It is incredibly easy to tamper with, and if it has been best case scenario is you'll waste money, worst case scenario you might end up in the hospital. My state had a bad batch going around about a year ago.
If you're going to take Ecstasy, KEEP A DRUG TEST KIT NEARBY. It is incredibly easy to tamper with, and if it has been best case scenario is you'll waste money, worst case scenario you might end up in the hospital. My state had a bad batch going around about a year ago.
Perhaps- or perhaps you have a skewed perspective of the average drug user.
Was there really a need to spam how 'cool' everyone was when nobody made such a claim? It's perfectly within your right to not imbibe in substances, and if people ever try to pressure you into doing so, they're in the wrong. However, nobody here tried to claim that they were better for their use- a discussion merely occurred, which you decided to take offense to.
Was there really a need to spam how 'cool' everyone was when nobody made such a claim? It's perfectly within your right to not imbibe in substances, and if people ever try to pressure you into doing so, they're in the wrong. However, nobody here tried to claim that they were better for their use- a discussion merely occurred, which you decided to take offense to.
I do condone usage. I do partake, but not regularly. You made the claim that "a really negative stain on communities like this one, and others too" by the mere fact that I partake in substances, without providing a reason as to why this makes me a stain. You presumed that I regularly abuse drugs, and that I use drugs either because I want a particular social standing or because I'm trying to fill a void in my life, neither of which are correct. You are now taking the defensive and claiming that this discourse is my fault for not being clear enough, when you yourself immediately started spamming throughout this comments section trying to incite a fight.
I don't need to know about what troubles substances have provided in your life, as I am not responsible for them. What we all are responsible for is being upstanding citizens and kind to others irrespective of our hardships.
I don't need to know about what troubles substances have provided in your life, as I am not responsible for them. What we all are responsible for is being upstanding citizens and kind to others irrespective of our hardships.
Do you regard mental health as an important field?
If so, are you opposed to the use of MDMA to treat PTSD, or LSD to treat depression? Studies a while back showed that one or two doses of either significantly improved mental health of those who imbibed. Currently, there are studies being conducted in Switzerland where cancer patients are being given LSD as a form of end-of-life therapy.
Are you opposed to the one-time use of a psychedelic substance to help treat mental disorders? This is not equivalent to taking a drug weekly for the sake of coping with life- it's generally a one-time experience.
If you think this is rational, then yes, there is a medical use for people looking for a euphoric or 'psychedelic trip.'
If so, are you opposed to the use of MDMA to treat PTSD, or LSD to treat depression? Studies a while back showed that one or two doses of either significantly improved mental health of those who imbibed. Currently, there are studies being conducted in Switzerland where cancer patients are being given LSD as a form of end-of-life therapy.
Are you opposed to the one-time use of a psychedelic substance to help treat mental disorders? This is not equivalent to taking a drug weekly for the sake of coping with life- it's generally a one-time experience.
If you think this is rational, then yes, there is a medical use for people looking for a euphoric or 'psychedelic trip.'
I'll play the devils advocate. I support the idea of using narcotics for medical purposes, Lysergic Acid Diothymede is very useful for curing Cluster Headaches (the most painful ailment currently recorded, 4 times more painful than being burned alive), and Methylindioxymethamphetamine is great for curing depression, except for the fact that it's dependency rate is nearly 100% in chronic users. The only portion of weed I hate is any amount of 'weed culture', the followers of such I would prefer something bad to happen to them, like getting hit by a car or breaking both of their wrists in some weird falling accident. Or that they get cluster headaches.
Cocaine, Heroin, those kind of drugs are illegal because they can be fatal, even with measured doses. It's the kind of thing you would need to see a doctor or other medical professional about, but I don't know any medical professionals who would prescribe Cocaine over any other energy increasing drug. Or heroin, for just about anything.
Cocaine, Heroin, those kind of drugs are illegal because they can be fatal, even with measured doses. It's the kind of thing you would need to see a doctor or other medical professional about, but I don't know any medical professionals who would prescribe Cocaine over any other energy increasing drug. Or heroin, for just about anything.
SirFormidio
There's even a non-psychedelic form of LSD that can be used to treat cluster headaches (which have been described as receiving a lobotomy with an icepick), yet the production of the substance is inhibited by current illicit substance regulations.
Since heroin was mentioned, I'd also like to make a point once again that a 'medicine' versus a 'drug' is a matter of perspective- plenty of opiates like heroin, such as Oxycodone or Hydrocodone, are prescribed by doctors for patients; they can be addictive and awful for your health in the same manner as heroin.
Claiming that substances are bad simply because they're illegal and called "drugs" isn't a very good argument.
There's even a non-psychedelic form of LSD that can be used to treat cluster headaches (which have been described as receiving a lobotomy with an icepick), yet the production of the substance is inhibited by current illicit substance regulations.
Since heroin was mentioned, I'd also like to make a point once again that a 'medicine' versus a 'drug' is a matter of perspective- plenty of opiates like heroin, such as Oxycodone or Hydrocodone, are prescribed by doctors for patients; they can be addictive and awful for your health in the same manner as heroin.
Claiming that substances are bad simply because they're illegal and called "drugs" isn't a very good argument.
Don't believe I did that, I believe I mentioned that I advocate the idea of medical usage of drugs and their application in the field of medicine and laboratory sciences, but dislike them for recreational purposes. I also believe that I mentioned some are illegal due to harmful side effects.
MrServi
"I just think it's pretty damn pathetic that you need to do drugs to get any enjoyment out of life."
Woah there, that's quite a presumption! I get plenty of joy from my academic studies, making music and spending time with my best friends. When I use them for fun, drugs are, as I mentioned above, like taking a trip to the amusement park. Certain substances have also aided me in changing my sober perceptions of the world, resulting in me being much happier; given how I only imbibe in them every two or three months, I do not see the harm.
Please, don't resort to ad hominem when all you have against me is presumptions. I'm having a great time enjoying my triple field-of-study custom degree at university, and am currently enjoying a fantastic drug-free vacation with two of the best people in the world.
"I just think it's pretty damn pathetic that you need to do drugs to get any enjoyment out of life."
Woah there, that's quite a presumption! I get plenty of joy from my academic studies, making music and spending time with my best friends. When I use them for fun, drugs are, as I mentioned above, like taking a trip to the amusement park. Certain substances have also aided me in changing my sober perceptions of the world, resulting in me being much happier; given how I only imbibe in them every two or three months, I do not see the harm.
Please, don't resort to ad hominem when all you have against me is presumptions. I'm having a great time enjoying my triple field-of-study custom degree at university, and am currently enjoying a fantastic drug-free vacation with two of the best people in the world.
just to point out,most people don't develop a broad enough understanding of the3 world by age 14 to be able to respectably say ANYTHING that you're saying...MDMA and Shrooms both have legitimately studied therapeutic benefits, in a safe environment. By that same token you're saying that "normal functional" members of society are okay, even if they're on valium prozac and all those other delightful and legally prescribed mind-altering substances... but because of misinformation and slanderous propaganda legitimately engineered medicinal compounds are illegal...and you trust the government to know whats best for the individual?
sooo, yeah...
sooo, yeah...
SirFormidio (tagged as FA hates reply brackets this low),
If you say so. The postal service doesn't seem to notice.
If you say so. The postal service doesn't seem to notice.
True. I simply fail to see how a white piece of paper is more suspicious than paper with blotter art… if tabs have blotter art on them, you can pretty certain what they contain! However, you may be right in that blank sheets do not offer more protection.
On another note, microdots seem to be regaining popularity, and candies are a current fad.
On another note, microdots seem to be regaining popularity, and candies are a current fad.
Comments