Zoe: Well looking on the bright side, you'll have a better view from the top now


Perhaps the strange thing is that I had previously deleted this post but then put it back, but I have an explanation

One individual who clearly can't tell the difference between a Real Problem and a Regular Drawing....

I won't put his name here for obvious reasons, so it all started when he left a comment here "No, not feral please. that's zoophilia" And on Twitter "It's such a shame when an artist you
really like makes unforgivable stuff like
zoophilia" and the Twitter post was deleted by the moderators, probably because of complaints from him and his friends, so I got worried and deleted the drawing everywhere

Because I've had enough situations with poner

Now I posted it again because.....
Where the fuck did he see Zoophilia?

No seriously, analyzing the drawing (not without the help of friends who are in this fandom more than I am) I didn't see a single hint of it, okay if it was a human instead of my character and had some sexual context I would understand the reason, but the drawing has nothing to do with Zoophilia...

The drawing is simply a cartoon illustration with two cartoon dogs in a colorful fairground setting.
One of the characters is inflated of course, like a balloon, which is a common trope in cartoon art.

Zoophilia refers to sexual attraction to animals, while this image simply depicts a bizarre, fantasy scene with fictional characters.
There is no explicit or implied sexual content in the image, making it unrelated to zoophilia...

You know what the funny thing is?
That in some cases, like Twitter, FA, Deviant Art and so on, doesn't even remove the actual Zoophilia most of the time, but yet people complain about ordinary drawings with fictional cartoon characters that clearly have nothing to do with it

I'm against zoophilia myself, but when some Dicks start writing and accusing you without really seeing the difference between actual zoophilia and regular furry stuff, it's stupid...